Please note that Blogger.com and Blogspot.com are US sites regulated by US
law. Blogger is a provider of content creation tools, not a mediator of
that content. We allow our users to create blogs, but we don't make any
claims about the content of these pages. Given these facts, and pursuant
with section 230(c) of the US Communications Decency Act, Blogger does not
remove allegedly defamatory, libelous, or slanderous material from
Blogger.com or BlogSpot.com unless required to do so by a court order. If
you obtain a court order in your country of residence requiring removal of
the allegedly defamatory content in question, please supply us with a copy
of the order so we can comply with its terms.
If a contact email address is listed on the blog, we also recommend you
working directly with the author to have the content in question removed
or changed.
Sincerely,
The Blogger Team
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Friday, March 11, 2011
Unauthorized?
The merchant bankers explain they have "representation in London, Switzerland, Thailand, and Malaysia." Please reference
www.investmentsuisse.com/is/our-group.html. Notice the mention of Switzerland. Interestingly enough, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) blacklisted the firm as of 03.03.2010 and posted that information on their official agency website. FINMA officials most recently confirmed that the firm's blacklisting is current and remains in effect. What kind of representation remains in Switzerland, for example, if the firm is blacklisted?
There might be some interest in correcting public information pertaining to another banking firm that is referenced on distributed documents as well as on "a list of unregulated persons who, based on information received by MAS, may have been wrongly perceived as being licensed or authorised by MAS." You can reference the Monetary Authority of Singapore list here.
If this information is incorrect then the bankers should be focused at getting off of these public lists... shouldn't they? Then the status amendment can be made available to the public.
As to Arizona, the Arizona Corporations Commission doesn't list Investment Suisse as being registered in Arizona as a Business Entity. As such, what would prompt the bankers to secure services of Arizona based representatives? Is it because documents were distributed by an Arizona registered "entertainment" company? If so, then Arizona would be an appropriate jurisdiction for action against the "entertainment" company. It makes sense that any action taken should be against those who used the offshore banker's documents to induce vendors, domestic US bankers and government officials to believe that there were massive offshore funds being held by specific merchant bankers. Make sure documents like the ones distributed by the "entertainment" company in 2009 and 2010, with some versions distributed early than that, are no longer used. That would be the proper thing to do. Hold accountable those who are in Arizona and used and/or distributed the documents in question to gain monies, services and contracts from others. As late as the spring of 2010, the "entertainment" company attempted to solicit a private loan (outside Arizona) to pay for the "engagement commitment fee" listed on Page 3 of the alleged loan document. The "entertainment" company had no collateral, only a promise to pay when the named banks released the funds. If the merchant bankers are so concerned about the misrepresentation of documents, it may be wiser, for example, to restrict the "entertainment" company (and its CEO) from using the documents to solicit loans from individuals in order to pay for "engagement commitment fees." Yet, it appears that the bankers haven't taken action in court against the "entertainment" company for unauthorized use of documents. Wonder why? Nothing else is relevant or carries jurisdiction in Arizona since nothing else exists or originates in Arizona aside from the "entertainment" company itself.
The first priority for the bankers should be getting off of these international blacklists that are available to the public. To get off the blacklist, contact FINMA officials. Once all of that is straightened out, then go after the "entertainment" company if you feel you have been damaged.
www.investmentsuisse.com/is/our-group.html. Notice the mention of Switzerland. Interestingly enough, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) blacklisted the firm as of 03.03.2010 and posted that information on their official agency website. FINMA officials most recently confirmed that the firm's blacklisting is current and remains in effect. What kind of representation remains in Switzerland, for example, if the firm is blacklisted?
There might be some interest in correcting public information pertaining to another banking firm that is referenced on distributed documents as well as on "a list of unregulated persons who, based on information received by MAS, may have been wrongly perceived as being licensed or authorised by MAS." You can reference the Monetary Authority of Singapore list here.
If this information is incorrect then the bankers should be focused at getting off of these public lists... shouldn't they? Then the status amendment can be made available to the public.
As to Arizona, the Arizona Corporations Commission doesn't list Investment Suisse as being registered in Arizona as a Business Entity. As such, what would prompt the bankers to secure services of Arizona based representatives? Is it because documents were distributed by an Arizona registered "entertainment" company? If so, then Arizona would be an appropriate jurisdiction for action against the "entertainment" company. It makes sense that any action taken should be against those who used the offshore banker's documents to induce vendors, domestic US bankers and government officials to believe that there were massive offshore funds being held by specific merchant bankers. Make sure documents like the ones distributed by the "entertainment" company in 2009 and 2010, with some versions distributed early than that, are no longer used. That would be the proper thing to do. Hold accountable those who are in Arizona and used and/or distributed the documents in question to gain monies, services and contracts from others. As late as the spring of 2010, the "entertainment" company attempted to solicit a private loan (outside Arizona) to pay for the "engagement commitment fee" listed on Page 3 of the alleged loan document. The "entertainment" company had no collateral, only a promise to pay when the named banks released the funds. If the merchant bankers are so concerned about the misrepresentation of documents, it may be wiser, for example, to restrict the "entertainment" company (and its CEO) from using the documents to solicit loans from individuals in order to pay for "engagement commitment fees." Yet, it appears that the bankers haven't taken action in court against the "entertainment" company for unauthorized use of documents. Wonder why? Nothing else is relevant or carries jurisdiction in Arizona since nothing else exists or originates in Arizona aside from the "entertainment" company itself.
The first priority for the bankers should be getting off of these international blacklists that are available to the public. To get off the blacklist, contact FINMA officials. Once all of that is straightened out, then go after the "entertainment" company if you feel you have been damaged.
Please outline specifically what is false.
Apparently there are some that would like to dispute the validity of documents on this website. Documents acquired from government websites and other sources. If there are specific documents or references that should be taken off the website, please demonstrate EXACTLY which of the attached documents is false and what is false about the specific document. Is there a dispute regarding the standing of some companies listed in the State of Nevada that are no longer operational, "revoked", "dissolved" and so on? Is there a dispute regarding the authenticity of documents and/or records in the public domain from various courts; including those is Arizona. Which of the documents specifically are mistakenly posted here and why are they incorrect? Please advise.
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Tempe Download
For some reason someone wanted to download a lot of documents and comments left on the blog. Is the information for a paper at the university or just studying documents? If people want to have documents and other information, you could email in a request.
But really...is there anything on this blog that has to do with advanced technology.
But really...is there anything on this blog that has to do with advanced technology.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
From Africa to Arkansas
Amazing when you think of the reach some people have. This week the CEO of a favorite merchant bank has been the interest of people from Africa to Arkansas. How does someone get that popular managing a niche merchant bank? Maybe it begs a few questions....!
And has anyone seen the leader of MFT World Entertainment lately. Last reported sighting were in and around the Tucson, Arizona area but for the most part it has been quiet. Would appreciate an update if anyone has had the pleasure of sharing some time with the theme park and movie studio developer.
And has anyone seen the leader of MFT World Entertainment lately. Last reported sighting were in and around the Tucson, Arizona area but for the most part it has been quiet. Would appreciate an update if anyone has had the pleasure of sharing some time with the theme park and movie studio developer.
Friday, March 4, 2011
Helpful Advice (not that it is directly related to anyone discussed on this blog)
Taken from the FBI's website
Advance Fee Schemes
An advance fee scheme occurs when the victim pays money to someone in anticipation of receiving something of greater value—such as a loan, contract, investment, or gift—and then receives little or nothing in return.
The variety of advance fee schemes is limited only by the imagination of the con artists who offer them. They may involve the sale of products or services, the offering of investments, lottery winnings, "found money," or many other "opportunities." Clever con artists will offer to find financing arrangements for their clients who pay a "finder's fee" in advance. They require their clients to sign contracts in which they agree to pay the fee when they are introduced to the financing source. Victims often learn that they are ineligible for financing only after they have paid the "finder" according to the contract. Such agreements may be legal unless it can be shown that the "finder" never had the intention or the ability to provide financing for the victims.
Tips for Avoiding Advanced Fee Schemes:
If the offer of an "opportunity" appears too good to be true, it probably is. Follow common business practice. For example, legitimate business is rarely conducted in cash on a street corner.
* Know who you are dealing with. If you have not heard of a person or company that you intend to do business with, learn more about them. Depending on the amount of money that you plan on spending, you may want to visit the business location, check with the Better Business Bureau, or consult with your bank, an attorney, or the police.
* Make sure you fully understand any business agreement that you enter into. If the terms are complex, have them reviewed by a competent attorney.
* Be wary of businesses that operate out of post office boxes or mail drops and do not have a street address. Also be suspicious when dealing with persons who do not have a direct telephone line and who are never in when you call, but always return your call later.
* Be wary of business deals that require you to sign nondisclosure or non-circumvention agreements that are designed to prevent you from independently verifying the bona fides of the people with whom you intend to do business. Con artists often use non-circumvention agreements to threaten their victims with civil suit if they report their losses to law enforcement.
Advance Fee Schemes
An advance fee scheme occurs when the victim pays money to someone in anticipation of receiving something of greater value—such as a loan, contract, investment, or gift—and then receives little or nothing in return.
The variety of advance fee schemes is limited only by the imagination of the con artists who offer them. They may involve the sale of products or services, the offering of investments, lottery winnings, "found money," or many other "opportunities." Clever con artists will offer to find financing arrangements for their clients who pay a "finder's fee" in advance. They require their clients to sign contracts in which they agree to pay the fee when they are introduced to the financing source. Victims often learn that they are ineligible for financing only after they have paid the "finder" according to the contract. Such agreements may be legal unless it can be shown that the "finder" never had the intention or the ability to provide financing for the victims.
Tips for Avoiding Advanced Fee Schemes:
If the offer of an "opportunity" appears too good to be true, it probably is. Follow common business practice. For example, legitimate business is rarely conducted in cash on a street corner.
* Know who you are dealing with. If you have not heard of a person or company that you intend to do business with, learn more about them. Depending on the amount of money that you plan on spending, you may want to visit the business location, check with the Better Business Bureau, or consult with your bank, an attorney, or the police.
* Make sure you fully understand any business agreement that you enter into. If the terms are complex, have them reviewed by a competent attorney.
* Be wary of businesses that operate out of post office boxes or mail drops and do not have a street address. Also be suspicious when dealing with persons who do not have a direct telephone line and who are never in when you call, but always return your call later.
* Be wary of business deals that require you to sign nondisclosure or non-circumvention agreements that are designed to prevent you from independently verifying the bona fides of the people with whom you intend to do business. Con artists often use non-circumvention agreements to threaten their victims with civil suit if they report their losses to law enforcement.
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Investment/ Merchant Banker Financing
Why would an investment/ merchant banker need a mortgage?? The excerpt below is taken from a lender's website and it comes in the form of a testimonial regarding financing for a proclaimed CEO of a merchant bank. You'll have to scroll down to see the quote if you refer to the original site.
You steered me through the maze and explained what to gather from overseas and I must say, the loan went as smooth as any borrowing I have made overseas, in my own known and resident jurisdiction. Mark, the thing which I most appreciated however, was your business ethics. By this I refer to the fact, that after the loan was approved and I settled and moved in, I had a couple of non-revenue earning questions for you. Nonetheless, you willingly returned my calls and gave me the information I needed, in spite of the fact you were not earning from me at this stage – I appreciate that kind of character.
I will have no hesitation in recommending you to anyone I meet who needs a mortgage and I will be introducing my daughter shortly who has just returned from Geneva – I know she will be in good hands.
Hon. Robert Cowley, Pelican Waters
You steered me through the maze and explained what to gather from overseas and I must say, the loan went as smooth as any borrowing I have made overseas, in my own known and resident jurisdiction. Mark, the thing which I most appreciated however, was your business ethics. By this I refer to the fact, that after the loan was approved and I settled and moved in, I had a couple of non-revenue earning questions for you. Nonetheless, you willingly returned my calls and gave me the information I needed, in spite of the fact you were not earning from me at this stage – I appreciate that kind of character.
I will have no hesitation in recommending you to anyone I meet who needs a mortgage and I will be introducing my daughter shortly who has just returned from Geneva – I know she will be in good hands.
Hon. Robert Cowley, Pelican Waters
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Merchant Banker Scorecard
If you haven't gone through tallying up the results or success rate for investments, placements or financial management representations boasted by MFT's bankers on their client list then here's how it looks based on the primarily Internet based searches.
(Note: Again, this is not an opinion, financial analysis, representation of corporate status and/or statement of "good standing" regarding any entity, their operations, current status and/or of any of the individuals named and/or related to any of the third-party documentation, links and/or sources referred to as part of or as linked to this blog.)
Google Search Result: No active or relevant results.
Number of Companies: 4
Continuing Operations: 0 Found
Names of Companies:
1. Groupo con Exito S.A., Antigua, West Indies.
2. Simon Thomas Associates, Washington, D.C.
3. Vessel Communications, LLC, New York, New York
4. Rockaway Beach Foundation, Rockaway Beach, Missouri
Google Search Result: Only postings from Investment Suisse website and the website of Paul Scribner.
Number of Companies: 20 (listed in this manner)
Continuing Operations: 2 (unrelated to the merchant bankers according to public representations.)
Names of Companies:
1. Austin Management Associates, Panama City, Republic of Panama
2. Windsor Berkshire Group, Panama City, Republic of Panama
3. Tradecraft Consulting, Inc., Ramat Gan, Israel
4. Priority One Management Company, Washington, D.C. (A Minnesota company appears to be completely independent.)
5. Ryvel Consultants Limited, Gibraltar (a company formation notice was published but that's it.)
6. SmallTalk Communications, LLC, Branson, Missouri
7. Bersh (International) Ventures Limited
8. The Bersh (International) Ventures Trust, Gibraltar (a company formation notice was published but that's it.)
9. Eagle Capital Plc, London, England, United Kingdom
10. Jets For Christ Foundation, Wilmington, Delaware
11. Priority One Management, Inc., Branson, Missouri (Unrelated company works operates in other jurisdiction)
12. Mortgage Loan Specialists, LLC, Branson, Missouri
13. Cushman Real Estate Management, LLC
14. Sullivan Investments, LLC
15. Sammy Lane Resort, Inc.
16. Branson Financial Center, LLC
17. White River Investments, LLC, Branson, Missouri
18. Promise Productions International, Inc., Branson, Missouri
19. AT Group Systems Corporate & Staff Trainers, Malaysia & Singapore
20. Sally Prince Great Portland, St Mayfair, London
Google Search Result: Possibly operating and with Internet presence.
Number of Companies: 5
Continuing Operations: 4
Names of Companies:
1. Freeman Boydston & Rolyat', Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, at 8908 S Yale Ave # 412, Tulsa, OK 74137. Phone Number: (918) 494-8999.
2. Cushman Properties
3. Berean Liberty Foundation, Branson, Missouri (May be linked to the Scribner Foundation according to Manta.com
4. Resort Development Group, Broken Hill Golf Course Resort Development, Australia may be represented by the Broken Hill golf course
5. Royal Swazi National Airlines Corporation (Swaziland).
Google Search Result: Formally "dissolved", "inactive", "suspended" or "permanently revoked"
Number of Companies: 7
Continuing Operations: 0
Names of Companies:
1. Eagle Capital USA, LLC, Las Vegas, Nevada
2. Raven Resources Corporation, Las Vegas, Nevada
3. National Drafting & Processing Systems, Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada
4. Citadel Financial Resources USA, LLC
5. Citadel Consulting, LLC
6. Citadel Aviation Holdings I, LLC
7. Citadel Family Limited Partnership
(Note: Again, this is not an opinion, financial analysis, representation of corporate status and/or statement of "good standing" regarding any entity, their operations, current status and/or of any of the individuals named and/or related to any of the third-party documentation, links and/or sources referred to as part of or as linked to this blog.)
Google Search Result: No active or relevant results.
Number of Companies: 4
Continuing Operations: 0 Found
Names of Companies:
1. Groupo con Exito S.A., Antigua, West Indies.
2. Simon Thomas Associates, Washington, D.C.
3. Vessel Communications, LLC, New York, New York
4. Rockaway Beach Foundation, Rockaway Beach, Missouri
Google Search Result: Only postings from Investment Suisse website and the website of Paul Scribner.
Number of Companies: 20 (listed in this manner)
Continuing Operations: 2 (unrelated to the merchant bankers according to public representations.)
Names of Companies:
1. Austin Management Associates, Panama City, Republic of Panama
2. Windsor Berkshire Group, Panama City, Republic of Panama
3. Tradecraft Consulting, Inc., Ramat Gan, Israel
4. Priority One Management Company, Washington, D.C. (A Minnesota company appears to be completely independent.)
5. Ryvel Consultants Limited, Gibraltar (a company formation notice was published but that's it.)
6. SmallTalk Communications, LLC, Branson, Missouri
7. Bersh (International) Ventures Limited
8. The Bersh (International) Ventures Trust, Gibraltar (a company formation notice was published but that's it.)
9. Eagle Capital Plc, London, England, United Kingdom
10. Jets For Christ Foundation, Wilmington, Delaware
11. Priority One Management, Inc., Branson, Missouri (Unrelated company works operates in other jurisdiction)
12. Mortgage Loan Specialists, LLC, Branson, Missouri
13. Cushman Real Estate Management, LLC
14. Sullivan Investments, LLC
15. Sammy Lane Resort, Inc.
16. Branson Financial Center, LLC
17. White River Investments, LLC, Branson, Missouri
18. Promise Productions International, Inc., Branson, Missouri
19. AT Group Systems Corporate & Staff Trainers, Malaysia & Singapore
20. Sally Prince Great Portland, St Mayfair, London
Google Search Result: Possibly operating and with Internet presence.
Number of Companies: 5
Continuing Operations: 4
Names of Companies:
1. Freeman Boydston & Rolyat', Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, at 8908 S Yale Ave # 412, Tulsa, OK 74137. Phone Number: (918) 494-8999.
2. Cushman Properties
3. Berean Liberty Foundation, Branson, Missouri (May be linked to the Scribner Foundation according to Manta.com
4. Resort Development Group, Broken Hill Golf Course Resort Development, Australia may be represented by the Broken Hill golf course
5. Royal Swazi National Airlines Corporation (Swaziland).
Google Search Result: Formally "dissolved", "inactive", "suspended" or "permanently revoked"
Number of Companies: 7
Continuing Operations: 0
Names of Companies:
1. Eagle Capital USA, LLC, Las Vegas, Nevada
2. Raven Resources Corporation, Las Vegas, Nevada
3. National Drafting & Processing Systems, Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada
4. Citadel Financial Resources USA, LLC
5. Citadel Consulting, LLC
6. Citadel Aviation Holdings I, LLC
7. Citadel Family Limited Partnership
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)